Sock Puppet Sarah Spins the Twittersphere

Posted in Main on February 11th, 2010 by fLaMePr0oF

We’ve all heard the story; the tempting internet advances of a pretty 19 year old student called Tiffany who is open minded and very horny, but who turns out to be some morbidly obese, sweaty, cheese poof munching shut-in from Alabama…

Or was that just me? As a 39 year old IT professional I should have known better but I’m ashamed to say, I was almost taken in, almost.  Her name was Sarah…

Maybe not so young and liberal minded, but famous, successful, well connected in the corridors of power, and coming to me on an oh so intimate and sincere level via her ‘personal’ Twitter feed, presenting the friendly face of No. 10 and promoting good, wholesome, and for the most part politically neutral causes, until recently that is…

Turns out that my socialist darling, the ‘Beauty’ to Gordon’s ‘Beast’, is not who I thought she was.  The reality is that my darling Sarah is in fact some slimy, manipulative, Downing Street PR minion who is only interested in seeing my X on a ballot paper. (Or even worse, my Sarah IS that minion, NO!)

At around 8:00 pm Wednesday evening this tweet was issued from the SarahBrown10 Twitter account:
SarahBrown10 http://bit.ly/c9gZlc this is just a lovely blog in memory of a much loved dad”

A quick investigation reveals that the purported ‘tribute to dad’ is in fact, (in the blogger’s own words), “about all my different interests, but mostly about politics”.

Closer inspection shows that there are indeed a LOT of politics, indeed a cursory look below the surface reveals the blog for exactly what it is; a ruthless pre election party political website in all but name, and comming from such a nice, sincere, church-going Geordie lad who “work[s] for the University of Northumbria to buy food, and sell[s] art to pay for holidays”, (and also happens to hail from that pesky, recently Lib-Dem voting social grade C1 demographic in the former Labour heart-land of North East England).  I don’t know if ‘Novocastrian Rob’ is real or imagined, (if real then I’d bet my vote he’s a paid up party member and local activist), but I do know this; when I saw the Tweet and read the blog, I was actually a little bit sick into my mouth.

Bootnote:

As a Lib-Dem voting, church going, C1 Geordie lad myself I can assure the No. 10 press office that they’ve severely missed the mark on this one.

Climate ’science’ not particularly scientific

Posted in Main on February 8th, 2010 by fLaMePr0oF

Cliemate ’scientists’ seem to think that they are ’special’, that the accepted rules of scientific research don’t apply to them…

One might expect climate researchers to formulates hypotheses, then test those hypotheses by running objective data through models and comparing / evaluating the results..?

Even if this were the case climate ’science’ differs from REAL science in that the models used are far from objective and can be tweaked to produce vastly divergent results, however, as this extract from a recent article explains, it’s FAR worse than that in practice…

It’s quite emblematic of how climate science has been conducted over the past ten years. The Upside Down Data is fine anyway, we’re told, because we all know it’s getting warmer; it’s fine to use upside down data, because the data fits. It’s blessed as an OK thing to do.

What amazed me in your account is the testimony by one climatologist, D’Arrigo, who told the Senate that cherry-picking is OK, that if you get “a good climatic story” (her words) from the data, then you can throw away the data that doesn’t suit the results. Torture the numbers until they confess, you call it.

It’s one of those things where you do a double take and ask yourself ‘did she really mean to say that?’. And perhaps there is some explanation for what she said and we’ve all got the wrong end of the stick, but as it was reported, yes, she said cherry picking was acceptable. There are other people working in the same area who have said the same thing.

One paleoclimatologist called Jan Esper has said you can throw away the bits that don’t give you the right answer – and it’s an advantage ‘unique to climatalogy’. Yes, they say it, and seem to believe it.

This isn’t science, is it?

No, it isn’t science. This is something Edward Wegman, the statistician who did a report into the science said – it’s not science. The cardinal rule is you decide your methodology and data, and see what comes out at the end. You don’t decide what you want at the end, then choose the data and methodology that gives you the ‘right answer’.

Bishop Hill: Gonzo science and the Hockey Stick
Torturing the climate numbers until they confess

“You don’t decide what you want at the end, then choose the data and methodology that gives you the ‘right answer’”, but this is exactly what climate ’scientists’ are doing, and governments are happy to fund and promote them so long as they continue to make predictions which feed their political agendas.

Muslims facing growing persecution in the UK…

Posted in Articles on February 1st, 2010 by fLaMePr0oF

by Kawsar Zaman

Attacks on British Muslims are being brushed under the carpet

Last Saturday hundreds of Muslim civic and community leaders joined together during a public meeting in Birmingham to discuss the growing spate of unchallenged hatred and bigotry flourishing against British Muslims in our country. It took place on the same day that more than 1,500 supporters of the English Defence League (EDL) rioted in Stoke-On-Trent against the so called “Islamification of Europe”.

EDL-thugs

No less than six police officers were hurt and five police vehicles damaged as groups broke through police cordons, yet the story was hardly anywhere to be seen in our mainstream media. One wonders what the public, police and political reaction would have been if it was the other way round, if it was Muslims rioting and on a rampage.

There are growing levels of unchallenged attacks on British Muslims in many forms, with the fury continuing to mount. There have been cases of Mosques being vandalised, Muslim students being stabbed on university campuses and general anti-Muslim bigotry spiralling out of control without any rebuff.

Last week in Leeds, a bus driver was arrested after he allegedly called a female passenger a Muslim terrorist and asked her if she had put a bomb on his bus.

In Manchester, bereaved relatives have been forced to erect CCTV cameras at a cemetery after a series of attacks on Muslim graves, while on Boxing Day last year, a mosque in the West Midlands was burned to the ground by arsonists for the second time; these are just some examples of the overt attacks taking place against Muslims.

All over Europe, the far-right have come to realise that in today’s world, attacks on immigrants, blacks or Jews are no longer acceptable if they are to capture a mainstream following. Rather, it is much easier to target Muslims. The BNP’s Nick Griffin, who described Islam as a “wicked and vicious faith”, is already on the record as saying:

“Bang on about Islam … because to the ordinary public out there it’s the thing they can understand. It’s the thing the newspaper editors sell newspapers with.”

At a time when some of our journalists often embark on a battle between who can write the darker tale about Islam or Muslim life, the media coupled with a lack of political will and direction have created a situation where attacks on Muslims, overt and covert, have sadly become acceptable.

In July 2008 Peter Oborne illustrated how anti-Muslim sentiments had achieved a level of respectability in Britain that no other form of prejudice enjoyed. He wrote:

“While overt racism and anti-Semitism were unacceptable in modern society: the systematic demonization of Muslims has simply become an important part of the central narrative of the British Political class; it is so entrenched, so much part of normal discussion, that almost nobody notices.”

Findings from a recent survey conducted by the British Social Attitudes Survey show that the public are far more opposed to Islam than to any other faith. Such views flourish because little is made or shown of the other side. In a recent survey conducted by the Open Institute Society, British Muslims were found to be the most patriotic in Europe.

Following the devastating earthquake in Haiti, Muslim charities based in the UK immediately pledged to raise more than two million pounds in emergency relief while Muslim students raised more than £300,000 through ‘Charity Week’ at universities across the country for orphans around the world. But you will of course never hear stories of this sort. Because they bluntly do not fit the mainstream stereotype of a Muslim.

The overwhelming feelings at the public meeting called by the Muslim Council of Britain was one of frustration and anger that anti-Muslim sentiments and attacks were not being adequately addressed by both the police and our political class. Enough is enough; we must act.

The usual suspects will of course accuse us of playing the ‘victim’ card, but British Muslims call not for special treatment, but equal treatment. Just like any other community, we call for a concerted effort to challenge extremism of any form which concentrates itself against minorities in a bid to create divisions to the detriment of our society and our country.

Bigotry, hatred and attacks against British Muslims are nothing new. But its unchallenged growth in our country can no longer be ignored. The half-hearted response by the government to this growing phenomenon has been far from adequate to date. The phase for window dressing is over. Now is the time to act.

What is urgently needed is clear leadership from both our police and the government in policy directions in dealing with Islamophobia in all its forms.

In 2005, in response to growing levels of anti-Semitism, a Parliamentary Committee was established to combat the threat. Likewise, at a time when British Muslims are now the new target for hatred and attacks, it is high time a dedicated committee is now set up to investigate Islamophobia in our country.

At a time when we join hands together in remembering the evils of the Nazi Holocaust, it would be most fitting to leave Carly Whyborn of the HMD Trust with the final say who, on Holocaust Memorial Day, referring to the treatment of minorities in Britain, said:

“We can pause to look at how we treat those around us. We can all make the choice to challenge exclusion when we see it happening – we can choose to stop using language that dehumanises others and we can stop our friends and family from dehumanising and excluding others.”

Article by Kawsar Zaman, law student at the LSE and guest writer for LeftFootForward