Recognising Propaganda
Posted in Main on January 26th, 2010 by fLaMePr0oFPropaganda is a form of communication aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position. As opposed to impartially providing information, propaganda in its most basic sense, presents information primarily to influence an audience. Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus possibly lying by omission) to encourage a particular synthesis, or uses loaded messages to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented. The desired result is a change of the attitude toward the subject in the target audience to further a political agenda. [Wikipedia]
You might be forgiven for thinking that there is no place for propaganda in our modern democratic society, this, however, couldn’t be further from the truth.
A particularly prevalent source of social / political propaganda is BBC News, particularly stories relating to key government policy…
In 2008 BBC News reported on the Governments proposal to revisit the question of building new nuclear power stations. The reports consisted of several brief voice clips of ‘respectable’ looking ‘experts’ and interested parties all speaking in favour of new nuclear power stations, followed by one heavily pierced dreadlock sporting ’activist’ who spoke against.
The problem with this report was not the issue of weather we should build more nuclear power stations, but the BBC’s deliberate and blatant bias in it’s obviously pro-government reporting.
Sometimes the propaganda is not so obvious; yesterday there were multiple reports on the break-down of power sharing in Northern Ireland and along side these stories was a report stating that young paramilitary sympathisers are using Facebook and other social media to promote their causes, including pictures of themselves posing with knives and guns…
It would appear in this case the other ‘related’ story has been deliberately released alongside this news to influence and colour public opinion in relation to the ‘militants’, promoting fear and anger, and garnering sympathy for the government if / when it has to suspend the devolved assembly at Stormont.
It’s important when taking in information from the news and other media to take a step back and examine what is being presented objectively; bias reporting can usually be identified quite easily if the bias goes against our own personal bias (and we all have one) and somewhat harder when it agrees with our position.
Peripheral stories, related and apparently un-related, are also often important – there is no such thing as a coincidence in news reporting – the Facebook Militants story is not a ‘new’ issue which just happens to coincide with the Stormont crisis, and who can forget the “good day to bury bad news” scandal…
fLaMePr0oF <><

